{"id":2527,"date":"2022-05-25T17:40:36","date_gmt":"2022-05-25T15:40:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bsiw.pl\/uchwala-sadu-najwyzszego-dotyczaca-kosztow-egzekucji-komorniczej\/"},"modified":"2022-05-26T10:07:51","modified_gmt":"2022-05-26T08:07:51","slug":"uchwala-sadu-najwyzszego-dotyczaca-kosztow-egzekucji-komorniczej","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bsiw.pl\/en\/uchwala-sadu-najwyzszego-dotyczaca-kosztow-egzekucji-komorniczej\/","title":{"rendered":"Resolution of the Supreme Court concerning the costs of bailiff enforcement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On 26 April 2022 The Supreme Court, in a case under case number III CZP 91\/22, adopted a resolution concerning the creditor\u2019s incurring the costs of non-expedient initiation of enforcement in the case of filing a motion to initiate enforcement when the limitation period for the claim covered by the enforcement title has expired.<\/p>\n<p>According to the content of the resolution, in the event of a refusal to initiate enforcement on the grounds of an obvious lapse of the statute of limitations of a claim resulting from an enforcement title when the creditor has not submitted a document confirming the interruption of the statute of limitations, the judicial officer issues a decision on collecting from the creditor a proportional fee in the amount of 10% of the enforced benefit.<\/p>\n<p>The resolution means that a creditor filing a motion to initiate execution proceedings when the wording of the enforcement title indicates the expiry of the statute of limitations is obliged to attach to the motion a document confirming the interruption of the statute of limitations. Otherwise, the judicial officer will refuse to initiate execution proceedings and will charge the creditor a fee without calling on him to submit such a document.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On 26 April 2022 The Supreme Court, in a case under case number III CZP 91\/22, adopted a resolution concerning the creditor\u2019s incurring the costs of non-expedient initiation of enforcement in the case of filing a motion to initiate enforcement when the limitation period for the claim covered by the enforcement title has expired.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1789,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"class_list":["post-2527","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bsiw.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2527","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bsiw.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bsiw.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bsiw.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bsiw.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2527"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bsiw.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2527\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bsiw.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1789"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bsiw.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bsiw.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}